Legal Opinion
Goldfarb v. Marchionne
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 8, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff sought declaratory relief and specific performance of a purchase and sale agreement for premises to be used by the plaintiff for his pizza and soft drink business. The judge found, and his finding is not clearly erroneous, that although the price in the purchase and sale agreement was stated to be $60,000, the parties had actually agreed on a price of $100,000, and that the lower price had been inserted at the plaintiff’s “insistence as he did not wish to have the property assessed ultimately at the higher figure.” The judge ordered that the property be conveyed at a price of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Town Planning & Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Amesbury Specialty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Gleason v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Ward v. GrantMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Braga v. BragaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Harness Tracks Security, Inc. v. Bay State Raceway, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitlock v. Max Goodman & Sons Realty, Inc. (In Re Goodman Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- Tauber v. QuanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re Harbour House Operating Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- McLaughlin v. AmirsalehMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- D. Federico Co. v. New Bedford Redevelopment Authority (In Re D. Federico Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.