Legal Opinion
Tauber v. Quan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 2007No. 04-CV-891PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from an award of summary judgment and specific performance in a suit to enforce an agreement to sell commercial real estate. The reluctant sellers, appellants Paul and Phyllis Tau-ber, argue that the agreement is too indefinite to be enforced. Alternatively, appellants assert that they were entitled to avoid the contract because they signed it by mistake. Appellants further claim that specific performance should have been denied because the purchaser, appellee Tin Quan, had unclean hands, and because the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- T. C. V'soske, S. T. V'soske, K. A. V'soske, George A. Spater and V'soske Shops, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick and E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- T Street Development, LLC v. Dereje and DerejeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- 1836 S STREET TEN. ASS'N, INC. v. Estate of B. BattleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Wood v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Blackstone Ex Rel. Estate of Whitley v. BrinkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.