Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Prager

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1914No. L.A. No. 3502PublishedCited by 5 opinions

MOTION to recall a Remittitur and for its correction by the insertion therein of a judgment for costs on appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Upon an appeal by one of the devisees under the will of Charles Prager, deceased, from the decree of settlement of final account and of distribution, the decree was affirmed by this court. (Estate of Prager, 166 Cal. 450, [137 Pac. 37].) The opinion was filed December 3, 1913, and became final at the expiration of thirty days from that date. Thereupon the clerk of this court issued to the court below a remittitur. This document did not include any judgment in favor of respondent for her costs on the appeal. She now moves for the recall of the remittitur and for its correction by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of PragerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Angelus Securities Corp. v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Cain v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Kohn v. KempnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Morgrage v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API