Legal Opinion

Kohn v. Kempner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1924No. Civ. No. 2652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLENN, J., pro tem.

In the above action, as originally prosecuted, plaintiff secured judgment in the trial court. An appeal was taken under the alternative method, but the judgment was affirmed. (Kohn v. Kempner et al., 59 Cal. App. 621 [211 Pac. 805].) Subsequently plaintiff herein (respondent on the original appeal) filed a memorandum of costs, included in which was an item for the sum of $32, paid hy him to the stenographic reporter and the clerk of the court for a copy of the transcripts on appeal in said cause. Upon motion to tax costs this item was stricken out. The appeal is from said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Kohn v. KempnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. In Re the Estate of PragerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Wilson v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Galbraith v. PaniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Newberry v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API