Legal Opinion

Cain v. French

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1916No. Civ. No. 1766PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to retax the plaintiff’s costs in the above-entitled action.

Upon the hearing of the motion the only objection urged to the cost bill related to the charge of $30.65 for the printing of the plaintiff’s brief in reply to the brief of the defendant upon the latter’s appeal from the judgment originally entered in the action in favor of the plaintiff. The sole point made in this court in support of the appeal is that when the plaintiff’s reply brief was filed upon the original appeal the expense incurred for the printing of such brief…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Billings v. SegarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. In Re the Estate of PragerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ellis v. WhittierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854
  4. Hepworth v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Pieper v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Record MacHine & Tool Co. v. Pageman Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. One 1937 Plymouth 6 4-Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API