Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Prager

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1913No. L.A. No. 3502PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Fannie Prager Cohn, one of the devisees under the will of Charles Prager, deceased, appeals from a decree of settlement of final account and of distribution.

The will, so far as its terms are material here, provides as follows:

“Second. I direct that all of the real property owned by me at the time of my death, situate without the corporate limits of the city of Los Angeles, be distributed to thé following named persons, share and share alike, to wit: My brother, Morris Prager; my nephews Lesser, Michael and Harry Prager; and my nieces, Eva and Bella Prager, and Regina Feintuch, Fannie Cohn,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Beard v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  4. In Re the Estate of VogtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In re the Estate of GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. McDougald v. RossiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Robbins v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
  4. Estate of WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. White v. DeeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API