Legal Opinion
Booth v. Moody
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1896PublishedCited by 39 opinions
From Marion: Geo. H. Burnett, Judge. Action by J. C. Booth against Z. F. Moody to recover commissions for procuring a purchaser of certain lands belonging to- defendant. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bean.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought by him to recover *223commissions as a real estate broker. The principal question presented is the sufficiency of the complaint, and is raised in this court for the first time. Omitting formal parts, it is as follows:
“1. That at all the days and times hereinafter mentioned the plaintiff was and for a long time prior thereto has been and now is a real estate agent and broker, carrying on business as such agent and broker in the City of Salem, Marion County, Oregon. 2. That at the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Sayre v. Wilson & IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Penter v. Staight & BeaversWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Fisk v. HenarieOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Houghton & Palmer v. BeckOregon Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Hillman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Washington Investment Ass'n v. StanleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Merkeley v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.