Baumgartner v. Meek
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from a judgment of $15,000 and interest upon the verdict of a jury in an action to recover upon a real estate brokerage listing. The document signed by the parties conformed to the California Real Estate Association standard form and so far as material to this appeal reads as follows:
“In consideration of the services of W. B. Griffiths Company, hereinafter called broker, I hereby list with said broker, exclusively and irrevocably, for the period of time beginning January 8, 1951 and ending March 1, 1951, the property situated in the Berryessa Valley,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bartlett v. KeithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Merkeley v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Sill v. CeschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Blank v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Wright v. Schutt Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Charles B. Webster Real Estate v. RickardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.