Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1996No. B097261PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.—

Introduction

This mandamus proceeding raises an important question of law. Does California law recognize a cause of action by an insured against its insurer for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based solely on the insurer’s unjustified failure to defend? The trial court resolved the matter in the negative by sustaining without leave to amend the insurer’s demurrer to the cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing pled by the insured. We decide the matter in favor of the insured.

Factual and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Amato v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Pershing Park Villas Homeowners Ass'n v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Pershing Park Villas Homeowners Association v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. McCann v. Lucky Money, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API