Legal Opinion

Hoskin-Morainville Paper Co. v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Calendar 37,815PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bush:nell, J.

Defendant’s appeal in the nature of mandamus deals with events which followed the verdict of the jury in the principal case. Plaintiff is a Michigan corporation, domiciled at Menominee, and defendant is a New Jersey corporation, whose principal offices are in New York City.

Three questions were submitted to the jury: (1) Nonpayment of the purchase price of 70 tons of paper; (2) loss of profit on an alleged contract for the purchase of 20,000 tons of paper for the year 1929; and (3) loss of profit on a similar contract for 10,000 tons of paper for the year 1930. The trial began…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Detroit Tug & Wrecking Co. v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In re Merriman's AppealMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. NickMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Shirley v. Drackett Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Benmark v. SteffenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Sloan v. Kramer-Orloff Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API