Hoskin-Morainville Paper Co. v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bush:nell, J.
Defendant’s appeal in the nature of mandamus deals with events which followed the verdict of the jury in the principal case. Plaintiff is a Michigan corporation, domiciled at Menominee, and defendant is a New Jersey corporation, whose principal offices are in New York City.
Three questions were submitted to the jury: (1) Nonpayment of the purchase price of 70 tons of paper; (2) loss of profit on an alleged contract for the purchase of 20,000 tons of paper for the year 1929; and (3) loss of profit on a similar contract for 10,000 tons of paper for the year 1930. The trial began…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Detroit Tug & Wrecking Co. v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- In re Merriman's AppealMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. NickMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Shirley v. Drackett Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Benmark v. SteffenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sloan v. Kramer-Orloff Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.