Legal Opinion

People v. Nick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960No. Docket 64, Calendar 48,207PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

Following a jury trial defendant was convicted in tbe circuit court of Oakland county of the crime of statutory rape. He was placed on probation by the trial judge for a period of 2 years under the supervision of the probation officer of the court, and, in addition to the usual conditions imposed under the statute, was required to pay costs in the sum of $500. On leave granted he has appealed from the conviction and from the denial of a motion for a new trial.

There is no claim that error occurred during the course of the proceeding prior to the submission of

*223the case to the jury. In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. People v. PizzinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. DuniganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. SchramMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. IaconisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API