Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sloan v. Kramer-Orloff Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1963No. Calendar 56, Docket 49,869PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1DissentO’Hara, J.

This is a review of an order granting a new trial in an action resulting in a judgment for slander against the Kramer-Orloff Co., Ben Kramer, and Richard Orloff, in the amounts of $1,500 for damage to plaintiff’s feelings, and *404$2,500 for other damages, a total of $4,000. The judgment is joint and several.

The court granted the motion for the new trial on the sole ground that the verdict of the jury was “manifestly against the great weight of the evidence.” Defendants cross-appealed seeking mandamus to compel the trial court to grant their motion for a new trial on the specific grounds:(1) That…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Marcott v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Anderson v. ConterioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hoskin-Morainville Paper Co. v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Schattler v. Daily Herald Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. LemmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fera v. Village Plaza, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. HerbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Benmark v. SteffenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Vanden Bosch v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API