Legal Opinion

Bartsch v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 1986No. 4056PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

This appeal arises out of the decision of the named defendant granting the application of the remaining defendants, Milton I. Schwartz, George J. Geanuracos, John F. McGarry, Melvyn Rapoport and Purification Pua, for a zone change and special permit to allow the construction of a medical office building in what had been a Residential AA zone. The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs’1 appeal, and we granted their petition for certification to appeal to this court. We find error.

On February 23, 1983, the defendant Milton I. Schwartz applied to the commission to amend the town zoning map and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Veseskis v. Bristol Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Fullerton v. McGowanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. SummervilleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Gaida v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Jachimek v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API