Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. McGowan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 1, 1986No. 3040PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment for the plaintiffs in an action on a contract for *625the purchase and sale of land with a house then under construction thereon in Newtown. The pro se defendant, who was the owner and builder of the house, has raised four claims of error with regard to the court’s findings and award of damages.1 We find no error.

The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiffs contracted on August 23,1978, to purchase the property in question from the defendant for $108,000. This purchase price reflected an agreement between the parties pursuant to which the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. Beckman v. JALICH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Orange Society of New Jerusalem v. KonskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  5. Orange Society v. KonskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. BourgoinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Bartsch v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  3. Bethlehem Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Morning Star Holding Co. v. KostopoulosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Epstein v. CarrierConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API