Legal Opinion
MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 15, 2013No. AC 34919PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiffs, Donna MacKenzie, David W. Santarsiero and Colleen M. Santarsiero, appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing their appeal from the decisions of the defendant Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Monroe (commission) granting a special exception to the defendant Real Time Investments, LLC, pursuant to § 117-1800 of the Monroe Zoning Regulations (regulations), and approving its request for a zone change pursuant to § 117-900 of the regulations.1 The plaintiffs contend that the court improperly concluded that (1) the commission, in…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- St. Joseph's High School, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- H-K Properties, LLC v. Mansfield Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Santarsiero v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of MonroeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Brenmor Properties, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Tillman v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.