Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Hass

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1944No. Patent Appeal 4820PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims (Nos. 1 to 4, inclusive) in appellants’ application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to new and useful nitroolefins.

The claims read:

“1. A nitroolefin having the general formula:

wherein R is a member of the group consisting of hydrogen, aryl, and alkyl, and R1 is an alkyl group having in excess of one carbon atom.

“2. 3-Nitro-2-pentene.
“3. 3-Nitro-2-hexene.
“4. l-Phenyl-2-nitro-l-butene.”

Th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. In Re HassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. In re LincolnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Application of HenzeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Application of Victor MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  4. Application of FinleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  5. Application of Arthur F. Wagner and Karl A. FolkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API