Soto v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTLE, * Senior District Judge:
Ready for decision now is the defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor notwithstanding the jury verdict for plaintiff. At trial the court overruled the defendant’s timely motions for directed verdict though then entertaining serious doubts as to whether the evidence warranted jury submission. That conservative course was adopted so that the jury could pass upon the case in the first instance thereby avoiding the necessity, come what may, of reinstating the case upon an overcrowded trial docket.
When the instant motion came in, the court, though still…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Webb v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Seeberger v. Burlington Northern R. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Hauser v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- BROWN v. NBM RAIL SERVICES INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- Hauser v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Jaeger v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.