Legal Opinion

Jaeger v. BNSF Railway Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 16, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00930Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 JOSEPH W. JAEGER, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C23-930-RAJ 10 v. ORDER 11 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, 12 Defendant. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Joseph W. Jaeger’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to 16 Compel Rule 34 Inspection. (Mot. (dkt. # 16).) Plaintiff seeks to compel inspection of 17 locomotives and resurfacing tools and materials in the possession of Defendant BNSF Railway 18 Company (“Defendant” or “BNSF”). (Id. at 2.) Defendant opposed the Motion (Resp. (dkt. 19 # 18)) and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Soto v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1979
  2. McFarland v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API