Legal Opinion
Hauser v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1984No. C7-83-186Published
1Opinion of the Court
346 N.W.2d 650 (1984)
Robert O. HAUSER, Appellant,
v.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.
No. C7-83-186.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 13, 1984.
Larry E. Stern, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Eric J. Magnuson, Roger R. Roe Jr., Mary W. Mason, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.
SIMONETT, Justice.
The trial court granted the defendant railroad a directed verdict in this FELA personal injury case because no negligence was shown. We affirm.
Plaintiff Robert O. Hauser sues his employer, defendant Chicago,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Webb v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.