Legal Opinion
Hauser v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1984No. C7-83-186PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The trial court granted the defendant railroad a directed verdict in this FELA personal injury case because no negligence was shown. We affirm.
Plaintiff Robert 0. Hauser sues his employer, defendant Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, for personal injuries under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51, et seq. (1976). At the close of plaintiff’s case, the trial court granted the railroad’s motion for a directed verdict and subsequently denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiff-appellant Hauser appeals. Aside *652from a disputed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Webb v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Higgins v. LufiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Smith v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Hauser v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Jondal v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987