Legal Opinion

Young v. St. Elizabeth Hospital

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1985No. 84-1041PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Plaintiff, an employee of Stewart-Warner Corporation (Stewart-Warner), brought suit against defendants, alleging negligent treatment of his injuries sustained on the job and while in the course of his employment at Stewart-Warner ’ s plant. Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of his third amended complaint against Dr. Zmigrodski, a company doctor (doctor), with prejudice, on the grounds that his cause of action was barred by the exclusive-remedy provision, section 5(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 48, par. 138.5(a)). The dismissal order contained…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Smith v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Marcus v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Crepps v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Deller v. NaymickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Steven Ewing v. St. Louis-Clayton Orthopedic Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Toomer v. United Resin Adhesives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. Bryant v. FoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API