Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the defendant Mary Ann Sheehan, a full-time salaried company nurse, has the status of an independent contractor at her place of employment and therefore may be sued by a fellow employee despite the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act. General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. The named plaintiff, Anthony Panaro, brought an action for malpractice against his employer, the Electrolux Corporation (Electrolux), the named defendant, and the defendant Sheehan, a nurse employed by Electrolux. The plaintiffs1 alleged that Sheehan’s failure to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.