Legal Opinion

Clark v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1986No. 8510IC449PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff worked for defendant Burlington Industries from 1951 to 1976, and from 1979 to his retirement in 1983. He worked in Burlington’s “weave rooms,” where power looms made continuous noise at or above the 90 decibel (db) level. (During the period 1976-1979 plaintiff worked in home maintenance and was not exposed to loud mechanical noise.) On 1 October 1971, new provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act went into effect which allowed compensation for occupational hearing loss related to long-term exposure to harmful noise. Shortly thereafter, Burlington issued hearing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Haynes v. . Feldspar Producing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Flint v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Carroll v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Leak v. Alcoa Corp.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004
  5. Lyerly v. Hoechst-CelaneseNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API