Carroll v. Burlington Industries
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
On appeal from a final order of the Industrial Commission, this Court has only a limited role. Where the Commission acts under a misapprehension of law in its fact finding function, we may remand so that the facts may be reconsidered in their true legal light. Clark v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 78 N.C. App. 695, 338 S.E. 2d 553, cert. denied, 316 N.C. 375, 342 S.E. 2d 892 (1986). We also may remand for evidentiary or other procedural error clearly prejudicial to one of the parties. E.g. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Reid Motor Co., 216 N.C. 432, 5 S.E. 2d 318 (1939) (error to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Porterfield v. RPC CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Reid Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jarvis v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Wall v. N.C. Department of Human Resources: Division of Youth ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Wagoner v. Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Deese v. Champion International Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Carroll v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.