Legal Opinion

Lyerly v. Hoechst-Celanese

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided March 3, 1997No. I.C. No. 368801Published

1Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Chapman. The appealing party has show good ground to reconsider the evidence. Upon reconsideration of the evidence, the Full Commission reverses the decision of the deputy commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award.

The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing as:

STIPULATIONS

1. At the time of the alleged contraction of an occupational disease, the parties were subject…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API