Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge Hardy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 62PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

We overrule without discussion Respondent’s contentions (1) that Article 30 of Chapter 7A of the General Statutes is unconstitutional because it was enacted prior to the time the Constitution was amended authorizing its enactment, (2) that the General Assembly unconstitutionally delegated its legislative powers to the Judicial Standards Commission, and (3) that the procedures followed by the Commission violate Respondent’s due process rights under both federal and state constitutions. All these arguments have been answered adversely to Respondent in *95In re Nowell, 293 N.C.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API