Legal Opinion

Beatrice Foods Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1982No. 81-1143PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues that the equipment it leases from Rental is used in an integrated system of interstate commerce and is not subject to Ohio use tax pursuant to R. C. 5741.02(C)(3) and Section 8, Article I of the United States Constitution.

R. C. 5741.02(C) provides, in part:

“The tax does not apply to the storage, use, or consumption in this state of the following described tangible personal property, nor to the storage, use, or consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased under the following described circumstances:

ii * * *

“(3) Property, the storage, use, or other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Department of Revenue v. Ass'n of Washington Stevedoring CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Scripto, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Worthington City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. B.O.C. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cole v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. American Society for Metals v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API