Legal Opinion

Scripto, Inc. v. Carson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 21, 1960No. 80PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Florida, by statute, 1 requires appellant, a Georgia corporation, to be responsible for the collection of a use tax on certain mechanical writing instruments which appel lant sells and ships from its place of business in Atlanta to residents of Florida for use and enjoyment there. Upon Scripto’s failure to collect the tax, the appellee Comptroller levied a use tax liability of $5,150.66 against it. Appellant then brought this suit to test the validity of the imposition, contending that the requirement of Florida’s statute places a burden on interstate commerce and violates the Due Process…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. General Trading Co. v. State Tax Commission of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. National Geographic Society v. California Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API