Department of Revenue v. Ass'n of Washington Stevedoring Companies
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
For the second time in this century, the State of Washington would apply its business and occupation tax to stevedoring. The State’s first application of the tax to stevedoring was unsuccessful, for it was held to be unconstitutional as violative of the Commerce Clause 1 of the United States Constitution. Puget Sound Stevedoring Co. v. State Tax Comm’n, 302 U. S. 90 (1937). The Court now faces the question whether Washington’s second attempt violates either the Commerce Clause or the Import-Export Clause.2
*737I
Stevedoring is the business of loading and unloading cargo from ships.3 Private…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.