Boyette v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
MICHOL O’CONNOR, Justice.
On original submission, a majority of the panel held that Don Gene Boyette, the appellant, was denied the assistance of counsel during the 30 days for filing a motion for new trial. Boyette v. State, 908 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995); see also, O’Connor, J., dissenting, at 59. The panel concluded the appellant had shown good cause under Tex.RApp. P. 2 (1997) (now Tex.R.App. P. 2) 1 to suspend the requirement of Tex.R.App. P. 31(a) (1997) (-now Tex.R.App. P. 21.4) 2 that a motion for new trial be filed within 30 days of sentencing.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Burnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- Callis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Cox v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.