Legal Opinion

Boyette v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 15, 1999No. 01-94-00531-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

MICHOL O’CONNOR, Justice.

On original submission, a majority of the panel held that Don Gene Boyette, the appellant, was denied the assistance of counsel during the 30 days for filing a motion for new trial. Boyette v. State, 908 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995); see also, O’Connor, J., dissenting, at 59. The panel concluded the appellant had shown good cause under Tex.RApp. P. 2 (1997) (now Tex.R.App. P. 2) 1 to suspend the requirement of Tex.R.App. P. 31(a) (1997) (-now Tex.R.App. P. 21.4) 2 that a motion for new trial be filed within 30 days of sentencing.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Burnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  4. Callis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Cox v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. In the Matter of $475,001.16, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Jack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  4. Jack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API