In the Matter of $475,001.16
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADELE HEDGES, Justice.
Appellant, Adam Mahamat, appeals from a default judgment in a forfeiture proceeding. In two points of error, appellant contends that (1) the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to establish that appellee, the State of Texas, properly served appellant with citation in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and (2) the trial court erred in rendering a no-answer default judgment because an answer was on file when the judgment was rendered. We reverse and remand.
Background
The State filed an action against appellant for seizure and forfeiture…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Texas Department of Transportation v. AbleTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Lozano v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In the Interest of A.L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Phillips v. Dallas County Child Protective Services Unit, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Ramirez v. Consolidated HGM Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Perkins v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Dodge v. Dodge, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.