Legal Opinion

Burnett v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 15, 1997No. 01-96-00768-CRPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAFT, Justice.

Appellant, Andrew Dwayne Burnett, pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at 40-years confinement. The important issue we address is whether appellant was deprived of counsel during the time he was required to file a motion for new trial so as to entitle appellant to another opportunity to file and seek a hearing on a motion for new trial. We also consider whether trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to prosecutorial argument and whether the trial court erred in limiting defense counsel…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Ex Parte AxelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Prudhomme v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  3. Tamez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  4. Benson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  5. Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API