Callis v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S OBJECTION TO THE RECORD
2Per curiam
On August 20, 1988, we remanded this case to the trial court pursuant to Tex.R. App.P. 55 for a hearing and findings concerning whether the record accurately reflects the date on which appellate counsel was appointed. Appellant had filed a sworn objection to the record contending that he was not appointed on December 9, 1987, as reflected by the order in the transcript, and that the true date of his appointment was January 15, 1988. The date of appointment is critical because sentence was imposed on December 9, 1987, and a motion for new trial, if…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Whitmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
4Cited by27 opinions
- Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Massingill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Burnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Jack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.