Legal Opinion

Callis v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 25, 1988No. 01-87-1122-CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S OBJECTION TO THE RECORD

2Per curiam

On August 20, 1988, we remanded this case to the trial court pursuant to Tex.R. App.P. 55 for a hearing and findings concerning whether the record accurately reflects the date on which appellate counsel was appointed. Appellant had filed a sworn objection to the record contending that he was not appointed on December 9, 1987, as reflected by the order in the transcript, and that the true date of his appointment was January 15, 1988. The date of appointment is critical because sentence was imposed on December 9, 1987, and a motion for new trial, if…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Whitmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

4Cited by27 opinions

  1. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Massingill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Burnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  4. Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  5. Jack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API