Legal Opinion
On-Line Power, Inc. v. Mazur
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 2007No. B189251PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
Cross-complainant David Mazur appeals from an order denying his motion for attorney’s fees after settling his action for unpaid wages pursuant to a' statutory offer of compromise. (Code Civ. Proc., § 998.) Because the trial court erred in ruling that the Labor Code provisions ensuring an employee’s right to payment of wages did not apply to salaried corporate executives, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
David Mazur sued his former employer, On-Line Power, Inc. (OLP), for unpaid wages. Mazur alleged he was OLP’s vice-president of sales…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Goodstein v. Bank of San PedroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Chinn v. KMR Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Davis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.