Legal Opinion
Eickhorst v. American Completion & Development Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 1, 1989No. 88 Civ. 3002(RJW)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendant, the E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. (“Hutton”), has moved to dismiss the com plaint against it pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. Defendants American Completion and Development Corporation, American Completion Program 1983-3 and Howard W. Phillips (the “American Completion Defendants”) have also jointly moved to dismiss the complaint on these same grounds. For the reasons that follow, the motions to dismiss the complaint are granted. Plaintiffs are given leave to replead the fraud claims dismissed for failure to satisfy the requirements…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. National Property Analysts PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Griffin v. McNiffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Landy v. Mitchell Petroleum Technology Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- O'BRIEN v. Price WaterhouseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Perez-Rubio v. WyckoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.