Legal Opinion
Griffin v. McNiff
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1990No. 88 Civ. 554(RJW)PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek to recover for losses sustained as a result of their investment in certain oil and gas limited partnerships. Defendants Crown Energy, Inc. (“Crown”), Wiener, Zuckerbrot, Weiss & Brecher (“Wiener”), Ruffa & Hanover, P.C. (“Ruffa & Hanover”), Price Waterhouse, J.H. Cohn & Company (“J.H. Cohn”), and Grant Thornton (“Thornton”) move to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint (the “Second Amended Complaint” or “S.A. C.”) 1 pursuant to Rules 9(b), 12(b)(6), and/or 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons that follow, the motions of Price Wa-terhouse, J.H.…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Ernest P. Kline v. First Western Government Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- In Re Nationsmart Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.