Griebel v. Rochester Printing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Rochester Printing Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 18tli day of January, 1897, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 13th day of January, 1897, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Follett, J.:
This action was begun May 22, 1888, to recover damages for the publication of an alleged libel. A judgment dismissing the complaint, entered on a verdict, was reversed and a new trial granted by the General Term in June, 1891. (60 Hun, 319.) On the second trial a judgment dismissing the complaint, entered on a verdict, was reversed and a new trial granted by this court in July, 1896. (8 App. Div. 450.) The judgment now under review is the result of the third trial.
It is unnecessary to state the facts out of which this case arose, as they are fully stated in the reports referred…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. . B.E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Griebel v. Rochester Printing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
- Griebel v. Rochester Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Reich v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baush MacH. Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- People v. TeiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Makino v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Astruc v. Star Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Baush MacH. Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.