Legal Opinion

Makino v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This appeal brings before us only two assignments of error: one challenges a ruling of the circuit court which denied the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and the other is predicated upon an order which overruled the defendant’s objection to a portion of the argument of plaintiff’s counsel to the jury.

The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was based upon a contention that the injuries which the plaintiff sustained resulted from a risk of his employment which he had assumed. The plaintiff was a section laborer in the defendant’s employ, engaged in maintaining defendant’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Celorie v. Roberts Bros., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Leonidas v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Walsh v. Southtown Motors CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Williamson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API