Williams v. . B.E.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The Story case and those which have followed it have settled the doctrine that the placing of an elevated railroad structure in a city street is inconsistent with its character as an open public street, and in the absence of the consent of the abutting owners to the erection, violates their rights as such, notwithstanding the title to the soil of the way is in the municipality and although the railroad company in erecting the structure acted under both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lahr v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Rolfe v. Inhabitants of RumfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
- Tucker v. HennikerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860
3Cited by62 opinions
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- People v. . PrioriNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.