Astruc v. Star Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
At Eaw. Action by Gabriel Astruc against the Star Company.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
In this action for libel the jury rendered a verdict for six cents. On the first trial it was left to the jury to determine whether the publication was libelous, and the jury brought in a verdict for the defendant. On appeal (193 Fed. 631, decided February 1, 1912) it was held that part of the article constituted libel per se.
On the second trial, in accordance with the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, I charged the jury specifically as to what part of the article was not libelous, and what part was libelous, per se. The jury received instructions as to the rules…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Amory v. VreelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Griebel v. Rochester Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Butler v. Gazette Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Astruc v. Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927