Legal Opinion

SMS Financial L.L.C. v. Ragland

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1995No. 86256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOODMAN, Presiding Judge.

This appeal was assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Civil Appellate Procedure Rule 1.203(A)(1)(a), 12 O.S.Supp.1994, eh. 15, app. 2. The defendants appeal the order of the trial court which: 1) overruled defendant Ragland’s motion for new trial, and, 2) granted summary judgment to the plaintiff.

I

Standard of Review

The standard of review of a summary judgment granted pursuant to District Court Rule 13, 12 O.S.Supp.1994, ch. 2, app., is whether the facts, inferences, and conclusions, viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mountain States Financial Resources Corp. v. AgrawalDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Cadle Company II, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Federal Debt Management, Inc. v. Weatherly, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. White v. WynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Gearhart Industries, Inc. v. Grayfox Operating Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Financial Co. v. GerardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. Professional Collection Consultants v. HanadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Bruin Holdings, Inc. v. ModerskiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Hunter's Modern Appliance, Inc. v. Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Hunter's Modern Appliance, Inc. v. Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API