Legal Opinion

Federal Debt Management, Inc. v. Weatherly

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 10, 1992No. 05-91-01321-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAPLAN, Justice.

This is a collection case. Federal Debt Management, Inc. (FDM) sued Lee Weath-erly to collect all sums due and owing under three promissory notes. The trial court held that FDM’s claims were barred by limitations. FDM appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

Weatherly executed three promissory notes payable to Heritage National Bank. Note 1 was in the principal sum of $1,100 and matured on September 30, 1986. Note 2 was in the principal sum of $4,400 and matured on November 3,1986. Note 3 was in the principal sum of $17,500 and matured on September 2, 1986. Weatherly defaulted in his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. Interkal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Cail v. Service Motors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. BumannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API