Legal Opinion
Professional Collection Consultants v. Hanada
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1997No. G019309PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
Professional Collection Consultants (Professional) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Bobby K. Hanada and Linda B. Hanada (Hanadas) after the court determined its suit was time-barred.
I
In April 1990, Farmers & Merchants Bank (FMB) loaned the Hanadas $75,000 secured by a six-month note maturing October 16, 1990. That same month, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was appointed receiver for FMB. Thereafter, the Hanadas failed to repay the loan; and in December 1992, the FDIC transferred it to First Southwestern Financial Services who later assigned it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John W. NewhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ruth G. Thornburg Michael D. Thornburg David Jean Thornburg Kathy Ann NorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. BumannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Mountain States Financial Resources Corp. v. AgrawalDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Medtronic Ave, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Federal Financial Co. v. GerardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- National Enterprises, Inc. v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bisno v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- LLP Mortgage, Ltd. v. BizarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.