Legal Opinion
Gearhart Industries, Inc. v. Grayfox Operating Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 14, 1992No. 76859PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Judge:
Appellant Gearhart Industries, Inc. (Plaintiff below), seeks review of the trial court’s order dismissing Plaintiffs Petition to Vacate Default Judgment. Plaintiff argues on appeal no notice of default judgment and objects to an award of attorney fees to Appellee Grayfox Operating Company (Defendant).
FACTS
Plaintiff filed its original petition in the trial court on January 7, 1983, alleging monies owed on a contract. Defendant timely answered and filed a cross-petition praying for damages and attorney fees. On March 4, 1985, a Journal Entry of Judgment was filed in District…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matthewson v. HiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Matter of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- B & P Construction Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Panhandle Royalty Co. v. FarniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Chesnut v. BillingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hill v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- SMS Financial L.L.C. v. RaglandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Brown v. W.M. Acree TrustCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Lane v. Seven Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($725.00)Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Wilder v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997