Legal Opinion
Hunter's Modern Appliance, Inc. v. Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 28, 1997No. 89386PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*702 OPINION
HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Appellant, Hunter’s Modern Appliance (Hunter’s), seeks review of the trial court’s order denying Hunter’s motion for new trial after the court had granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Bank IV Oklahoma (Bank). Defendant Betty Kahle (Kahle) is not a party to this appeal. The appeal is submitted without appellate briefing in accordance with the accelerated procedures in Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36.
¶2 As alleged by Hunter’s, this action arises from a scheme by Kahle, Hunter’s employee, whereby she converted to her own use $92,422.29 in funds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Wilkerson Motor Co., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- W. R. Grimshaw Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Western Star Finance, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Hunter's Modern Appliance, Inc. v. Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997