Legal Opinion

Stuart Whitman, Inc. v. Cataldo

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1986No. B015119PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROWEN, J. *

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting plaintiff (respondent herein) its motion for summary judgment against defendants (appellants herein) because of the defendants’ failure to appear at properly noticed pretrial deposition discovery proceedings.

The issues before this court relate (1) to the timeliness of the filing of the notice of appeal, and therefore to this court’s jurisdiction in the matter, and (2) to the propriety of the trial court’s order striking appellants’ answer and entering default judgment for respondent because of appellants’ willful…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Slawinski v. MocettiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Thompson, Curtis, Lawson & Parrish v. ThorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sharp v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Freiberg v. City of Mission ViejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Micalizio v. MicalizioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Insyst, Ltd. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API