Insyst, Ltd. v. Applied Materials, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
Introduction
In this day and age and location, what is popularly called Silicon Valley, electronic mail (e-mail) has virtually supplanted regular mail (sometimes pejoratively dubbed “snail” mail) for many types of communication. The issue presented by the motion under our review is whether an e-mailed notice of the entry of the judgment in this complex litigation was sufficient to start the time running to file a notice of appeal.
Defendants Applied Materials, Inc., and Applied Materials (Israel) Ltd. have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by plaintiff InSyst, Ltd., as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Erickson v. R.E.M. Concepts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Worldmark, the Club v. Wyndham Resort Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ellis v. Ellis CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ammari v. AmmariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Ellis v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Horton v. Horton CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.