Legal Opinion

Insyst, Ltd. v. Applied Materials, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2009No. H033058PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

Introduction

In this day and age and location, what is popularly called Silicon Valley, electronic mail (e-mail) has virtually supplanted regular mail (sometimes pejoratively dubbed “snail” mail) for many types of communication. The issue presented by the motion under our review is whether an e-mailed notice of the entry of the judgment in this complex litigation was sufficient to start the time running to file a notice of appeal.

Defendants Applied Materials, Inc., and Applied Materials (Israel) Ltd. have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by plaintiff InSyst, Ltd., as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Erickson v. R.E.M. Concepts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Worldmark, the Club v. Wyndham Resort Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Ellis v. Ellis CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Ammari v. AmmariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Ellis v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Horton v. Horton CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API