Legal Opinion

Slawinski v. Mocettini

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1965No. S. F. 21974PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal on the ground that it was not timely filed.

A jury trial in this wrongful death action resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $169,000. An order granting a motion for new trial was affirmed on appeal (Slawinski v. Mocettini, 217 Cal.App.2d 192 [31 Cal.Rptr. 613]), and on retrial the court granted a nonsuit. Judgment was entered on May 21, 1964, and notice of the entry of judgment was served the following day.

Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was heard on July 10. The clerk’s minutes for that day state that after argument by counsel the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. CallowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. HeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Pressler v. Donald L. Bren Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. United Farm Workers of America v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API