Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Union Pacific Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1992No. F015353PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, P. J.

Plaintiff has appealed from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant ordering that plaintiff take nothing by his first amended complaint. This complaint sought damages for personal injuries sustained in a diving accident. Plaintiff alleged defendant engaged in willful misconduct by failing to guard or warn against a dangerous condition presented by a railroad trestle which spanned an irrigation canal and was therefore liable for plaintiff’s injuries.

We do not reach the merits of the case but dismiss the appeal because plaintiff’s notice of appeal was not timely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. National Advertising Co. v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Younesi v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Stuart Whitman, Inc. v. CataldoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Jones v. Catholic Healthcare WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Lee v. Placer Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. AO Alpha-Bank v. Yakovlev, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Weinbaum v. Goldfarb, Whitman & CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API