Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1987No. 160A86PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

Questions presented on this appeal are whether the trial court erred by (1) admitting certain testimony by the prosecuting witness; (2) permitting certain cross-examination of the defendant; (3) accepting guilty verdicts and imposing sentences for both first degree kidnapping and first degree rape; and (4) denying defendant’s motion to dismiss all charges for insufficiency of the evidence. We find merit in defendant’s contentions as to question three. We conclude there was no other error in defendant’s trial and convictions. We remand for further sentencing proceedings…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. SneedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. DudleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. LanierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Williams v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API